Aim:
To investigate the capacity of short term memory
Method:
- Participants counted a number of dots flashed onto a screen
Results:
- Participants could recall about 7 items
- Participants would recall the same number of items for letters/numbers/words
Conclusion:
- Short term memory holds 7±2 items
- People chunk things together in order to retain more information
Evaluation:
- A variety of studies show that short term memory is limited to just 4 chunks
- Cowan (2001)
- When tested on purely visual information it was found that 4 items were the limit
- Vogel et al. (2001)
- Simon (1974) found that the size of the chunks affect the capacity of STM
- Larger chunks (such as phrases) mean a shorter span
- Smaller chunks (such as letters) mean a longer span
Showing posts with label memory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label memory. Show all posts
Thursday, 14 March 2013
Saturday, 9 March 2013
Peterson and Peterson (1959)
Aim:
To investigate the duration of short term memory
Method:
- they enlisted 24 students attending their university
- they used a consonant syllable and 3 numbers (e.g. WRT 637)
- this was done so that they were not meaningful/memorable
- participants were asked to count backwards for intervals of time
- prevents rehearsal of the syllable
- they used different retention intervals (e.g. 3, 9, 12, 18 seconds)
Results:
- 90% could recall after 3 seconds
- 2% could recall after 18 seconds
Conclusion:
the duration of short term memory is 20 seconds max
Evaluation:
- the participants knew that they needed to recall after a period of time
- Marsh et al. (1997)
- participants were not expecting to recall they forgot the syllable after 2 seconds
- suggests that STM is much shorter
- Peterson and Peterson were only studying one type of memory
- words and syllables
- real-life scenarios differ and other types of memory are more frequently used
- remember faces/events
- validity - mundane realism
To investigate the duration of short term memory
Method:
- they enlisted 24 students attending their university
- they used a consonant syllable and 3 numbers (e.g. WRT 637)
- this was done so that they were not meaningful/memorable
- participants were asked to count backwards for intervals of time
- prevents rehearsal of the syllable
- they used different retention intervals (e.g. 3, 9, 12, 18 seconds)
Results:
- 90% could recall after 3 seconds
- 2% could recall after 18 seconds
Conclusion:
the duration of short term memory is 20 seconds max
Evaluation:
- the participants knew that they needed to recall after a period of time
- Marsh et al. (1997)
- participants were not expecting to recall they forgot the syllable after 2 seconds
- suggests that STM is much shorter
- Peterson and Peterson were only studying one type of memory
- words and syllables
- real-life scenarios differ and other types of memory are more frequently used
- remember faces/events
- validity - mundane realism
- they were not testing the duration
- the counting backwards cause the participants to displace the syllable rather than simply preventing rehearsal
- the counting backwards cause the participants to displace the syllable rather than simply preventing rehearsal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)